The Latest on Marijuana Laws in Amsterdam

Nurseries promise you can take most of their seeds back into the USA. An exception is this marijuana starter kit.

Dutch pot smokers are complaining that the generation that was running naked on acid around Amsterdam’s Vondelpark during the Sixties is now threatening the well-established, regulated marijuana trade in the Netherlands.

Responding to international pressure and conservatives in rural and small-town Holland, the federal government is cracking down on coffeeshops (which legally sell marijuana). But big-city mayors, like Amsterdam’s, will fight to keep them open. Amsterdam’s leaders recognize that legalized marijuana and the Red Light District’s prostitution are part of the edgy charm of the city; the mayor wants to keep both, but get rid of the accompanying sleaze. The Dutch have learned that when sex and soft drugs are sold on the street (rather than legally), you get pimps, gangs, disease, hard drugs, and violence. Amsterdam recognizes the pragmatic wisdom of its progressive policies and is bucking the federal shift to the right. Locals don’t want shady people pushing drugs in dark alleys; they’d rather see marijuana sold in regulated shops.

While in Amsterdam, I took a short break from my guidebook research to get up-to-speed on the local drug policy scene. I find this especially interesting this year, as I’m co-sponsoring Initiative 502 in Washington State, which is on track to legalize, tax, and regulate the sale of marijuana for adults (on the ballot this November).

The Netherlands’ neighboring countries (France and Germany) are complaining that their citizens simply make drug runs across the border and come home with lots of pot. To cut back on this, border towns have implemented a “weed pass” system, where pot is sold only to Dutch people who are registered. But the independent-minded Dutch (especially young people) don’t want to be registered as pot users, so they are buying it on the street — which is rekindling the black market, and will likely translate to more violence, turf wars, and hard drugs being sold. The next step: In January of 2013, this same law will come into effect nationwide — including in Amsterdam, whose many coffeeshops will no longer be allowed to legally sell marijuana to tourists.

Locals point out that the Dutch are not more “pro-drugs” than other nations. For example, my Dutch friends note that, while the last 20 years of US Presidents (Clinton, Bush, Obama) have admitted or implied that they’ve smoked marijuana, no Dutch prime minister ever has. Many Dutch people are actually very anti-drugs. The Dutch word for addiction is “enslavement.” But the Dutch response to the problem of addiction is very different from that of the US.

Being a port city, Amsterdam has had its difficult times with drug problems. In the 1970s, thousands of hard-drug addicts made Amsterdam’s old sailor quarter, Zeedijk, a no-go zone. It was nicknamed “Heroin Alley.” To fight it, they set up coffeeshop laws (allowing for the consumption of pot while cracking down on hard-drug use). Today Zeedijk is gentrified, there’s no sense of the old days, and various studies indicate that Holland has fewer hard-drug users, per capita, than many other parts of Europe.

From the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s, the number of coffeeshops exploded. The Dutch observed that marijuana use rates increased, too, so they made changes, closing shops that ignored rules or generated neighborhood complaints. Now, new coffeeshop licenses are no longer being issued, and the number of coffeeshops in Amsterdam has declined from a peak of over 700 to about 200 today. With the movement afoot to crack down on things, coffeeshops are trying harder than ever to be good citizens and to nurture good relations with their neighbors.

While most Americans like their joints made purely of marijuana, the Dutch (like most Europeans) are accustomed to mixing tobacco with marijuana. There are several reasons: Back in the 1970s, most “pot smokers” here smoked hash, which needs to be mixed with something else (like tobacco) to light up. Today, more Dutch prefer “herbal cannabis” — the marijuana bud common in the US — but they still keep the familiar tobacco in their joints. Tobacco-mixed joints also go back to hippie days, when pot was expensive and it was simply wasteful to pass around a pure marijuana joint. Mixing in tobacco allowed poor hippies to be generous without going broke. And, finally, the Dutch don’t dry and cure their marijuana, so it’s simply hard to smoke without tobacco. Any place that caters to Americans will have joints without tobacco, but you have to ask specifically for a “pure” joint. Joints are generally sold individually (for €3 to €5, depending on the strain you choose).

Coffeeshops are allowed only half a kilo (about a pound) of pot in their inventory at any given time. On a typical day, a busy shop will sell three kilos (and, therefore, take six deliveries). Very little marijuana is imported anymore, as the technology is such that strains from all over the world can be grown in local greenhouses. (And the Dutch wrote the book on greenhouses.) “Netherlands weed” is now refined, like wine.

The Dutch hemp heritage goes way back in this sailing culture. In the days of Henry Hudson, hemp was critical for quality rope and for sails. The word “canvas” comes from the same root as “cannabis.” In fact, there was a time when tobacco was the pricey leaf, and sailors mixed hemp into their cigarettes to stretch their tobacco.

Tourists who haven’t smoked since they were students are famous for overdosing in Amsterdam, where they can suddenly light up without any paranoia. Coffeeshop baristas nickname tourists about to pass out “Whitey” — because of the color their face turns just before they hit the floor. The key is to eat or drink something sweet to stop from getting sick. Coca-Cola is a good fast fix, and coffeeshops keep sugar tablets handy.

No one would say smoking pot is healthy. It’s a drug. It’s dangerous, and it can be abused. The Dutch are simply a fascinating example of how a society can allow marijuana’s responsible adult use as a civil liberty, and treat its abuse as a health-care and education challenge rather than a criminal issue. They have a 25-year track record of not arresting pot smokers, and have learned that if you want to control a substance, the worst way to do it is to keep it illegal. Regulations are strictly enforced. While the sale of marijuana is allowed, advertising is not. You’ll never see any promotions or advertising in windows. In fact, in many places, the prospective customer has to take the initiative and push a button to illuminate the menu in order to know what’s for sale. And, surprisingly, marijuana is just not a big deal in the Netherlands — except to tourists coming from lands where you can do hard time for lighting up. A variety of studies have demonstrated that the Dutch smoke less than the European average — and fewer than half as many Dutch smoke pot, per capita, as Americans do.

Days 7-8: Drugs in Houston

Keith dropped me off at the Denver airport for a side-trip to Houston. Fighting my way through the chaos accompanying the merger of United and Continental airlines, I finally boarded my plane. I spent the flight preparing a new talk I was about to give as a keynote address to an assembly of drug policy wonks to kick off an all-day conference on the topic.

While Houston is considered the new hub for illegal drugs entering the USA from Latin America there’s a lot of beer here too. This house, Houston’s famous “beer house”, is literally covered with beer cans.

On the airplane, Fox News was dishing out its idea of “fair and balanced” news coverage on the backs of 100 seats all around me. I don’t know how United can inflict that on a captive audience of their passengers. (Meanwhile, I enjoyed the thought that just yesterday, Fox News friend Pat Robertson came out in favor of legalizing marijuana.)

In Houston, Professor Emeritus William Martin — a wonderful man, a fixture at Rice University, and the official biographer of Billy Graham — hosted me at the James Baker Institute, where speakers from around the world are brought together to inspire Houstonians to thoughtful civic responsibility. I gave a one-hour, two-part talk: the abbreviated TED version of my Travel as a Political Act talk, followed by my NORML material that emphasizes European drug policy. While I was a bit nervous (speaking to a room full of leading Houstonians and well-connected patrons of the university from a podium that has been occupied by everyone from Nelson Mandela to Bill Clinton to Henry Kissinger), my talk was well received.

Later that night, over dinner with drug policy activists (on both sides of the issue), we had a lively conversation. I sat next to a mentor of mine, Ethan Nadelmann, the founder and executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance. Ethan has recently been shuttling between sitting presidents south of our border. Several Latin American countries (including Mexico, Costa Rica, Guatemala, El Salvador, and Colombia) have begun talking about the wisdom of taking the crime out of the drug equation to help alleviate some of the violence wracking their societies. As Ethan counsels them on the pragmatism of legalizing marijuana, Joe Biden is flying there to remind them that if they do, they’ll find themselves in a costly trade war with the USA.

The guest speaker takes pictures of himself in a mirror.

A drug policy expert from England and I explored the existentialism of drug abuse. It seems like hard drug use in the rich world correlates with futility and meaningless in life (for example, many Russians with go-nowhere lives drown themselves in vodka all alone). He made a good case that consumption in Europe is related not to the impact of existing laws, but to how a society supports its struggling citizens. For example, the Netherlands and Switzerland have similar laws — but the Swiss, with a less forgiving welfare system, have more needle junkies, while the Dutch, with a more generous way of taking care of its troubled citizens, have far fewer hard drug users. I asked him why the Czechs smoke more marijuana than any other European country. He speculated that it may be because after they won their freedom from the USSR, and the poet and playwright Václav Havel was swept into power, it was a little like the hippies taking over. Comparing the war on marijuana to Prohibition back in the 1920s and 1930s, someone said, “Alcohol with Al Capone is worse than alcohol without.”

A man at our table who had advised the US drug czar recalled how, during one negotiation session with European officials on drug policy, the Americans started the meeting by saying, “If you say the phrase ‘harm reduction,’ we’ll have to leave the room.” (For eight years during the Bush Administration, no drug policy proposal with that term was even allowed to be considered — as “harm reduction” is considered code for legalization.)

Confirming my understanding that countries are extorted into keeping pot illegal by American trade policies (enforced through United Nations agreements), I learned that while rich countries incur a trade war if they legalize any drug, poor countries get “decertified” (in other words, disqualified from receiving foreign aid) if they decide to legalize marijuana. Because of this, the presidents of Mexico and other Latin American nations are between a rock and a hard place when it comes to taking the violence and money out of their local drug wars.

Then, after a day of events for Houston PBS, I flew north to Oklahoma City to meet Keith and continue our Road Trip USA.

Marijuana Policy Behind the Scenes: My Notes from a Drug Policy Reform Conference

With a group of respected and caring citizens, IOfficial-Certification have co-sponsored Initiative 502 in Washington State (New Approach Washington), which will legalize, tax, and regulate the sale of marijuana for adults. We worked very hard last year to gather more than 350,000 signatures. Last month, we turned them in, and last week, our state government certified that we had gathered enough good signatures. This means that (unless our legislature simply accepts the initiative outright), I-502 will be on the ballot in November of 2012.

I’m working with a wonderful group of activists who (like their counterparts did in the 1930s to end the prohibition against alcohol) endeavor to end the US government’s war on marijuana. We believe that it’s not a question of if the USA will stop sending pot smokers to jail…it’s a matter of when. While there are many good reasons to be waging this battle, for me this is a matter of civil liberties and pragmatic harm reduction.

As with the laws against booze during Prohibition, people are realizing that the laws against marijuana are causing more harm to our society than the very drug they criminalize. When alcohol was finally legalized, no one was saying, “Booze is good.” Rather, they were deciding that the law was bad, and that it made more sense to tax and regulate alcohol as a recreational drug and to take the money, violence, and crime out of the equation — to treat its abuse not as a crime, but as a health and education challenge. I believe that is what’s happening now in our country with a reconsideration of laws criminalizing marijuana use. And I believe Washington State will become the first state in the country to actually legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana this November. I will be working hard between now and then to help make that happen.

I am excited and proud of our work. The people on our team see this not as a “pro-drug use” crusade, but as a “smart drug law” crusade. I’ve been a board member of NORML for ten years, and during that time I’ve attended many drug policy conventions around the country. I just returned from a very good conference put on by the Drug Policy Alliance and co-hosts including the ACLU, Open Society Foundations, and the International Drug Policy Consortium. I thought you might enjoy an insight into what people discuss at such an event. So, for your interest, I’ve typed up some of my rough notes. I should stress that I don’t necessarily agree with all these points — I simply found them thought-provoking, and hope you might, as well.

Notes from the International Drug Policy Reform Conference
November, 2011, in Los Angeles

The system (as established and maintained by the USA) is rigged to prevent change. Drug policies are dictated by the UN. If a country is decertified (which can happen, for example, if it legalizes marijuana), the US Congress is required to vote against them in trade policies (causing an expensive trade war). Another example: Our drug czar is required by our government to vote to keep drugs illegal.

If an individual state passes a law that takes a course different then the federal law, the USA’s ability to impose its drug laws on the rest of the world will be diminished. The paper tiger of UN drug treaties will then change as the USA is forced to reconsider its war on marijuana

Or: Rich countries in the north can ignore the USA and UN. But in the south, poor countries will likely continue to follow regressive drug laws to protect relations with the USA, Japan, or Russia. They know they can lose their foreign aid and favored trade status if they buck US drug policy dictates.

While the USA enforces UN treaties on the rest of the world, it can ignore them domestically because our constitution prohibits us from having to follow any international laws.

“UN” is a four-letter word in DC. The UN is held just below the French in contempt. The UN was 60 nations at first. Now it’s 200 nations. The USA hates the “one nation, one vote” element of the UN. We are more comfortable with World Bank and IMF (because votes are weighted and the USA can throw its weight around).

UN votes are public, so consensus is extorted. With private voting, like for secretary general, many countries would oppose the USA on drugs. But it’s too costly and dangerous to do so publically, especially for a poor or Third World country. So when drug policy is brought to a vote, little countries comply with the USA.

When it comes to the rest of the world, we don’t have a weapons shield. We have a news shield and an ideas shield. “War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.”

The USA even wants to prohibit indigenous people from chewing cocoa leaf.

While the Dutch have to keep drug laws on the books due to international conventions (i.e., US indirect threats and pressure), they have a system of just ignoring them (like Seattle does with I-75 — letting enforcement of marijuana laws be the last priority). The Dutch justice system has the option to enforce a law only if it’s considered in the national interest.

Because the illegal drug trade is so profitable, there is an established elite class of big-time drug merchants in drug-producing countries throughout the world. “Narcotecture” is the name of fancy mansions of drug dealers in poor countries like Afghanistan. Current drug laws are enriching organized crime throughout the world.

The UN is west-centric, with our values of individual over common good. Where we might celebrate “civil liberties,” someone in Taiwan exercising what we might promote as a basic freedom can bring shame on their grandparents or community with their action.

To people outside our country, we Americans live in the belly of the drug-war beast. Countries with compassionate and “harm reduction” policies like Portugal provide a beacon of hope.

Portugal’s “Law 30”
Portugal’s “Law 30” decriminalized the consumption of all drugs in 2000. They recently had a ten-year review, and even though a conservative government has since replaced the more progressive government that established this law, the law is considered good. Even former opponents of the law agree that its benefits far outweigh its harms. “Law 30” will continue to be Portuguese law of the land.

Portugal was repressed by a dictatorship until 1974. With freedom, people embraced their liberty. Activities like drug use spiked (temporarily). In 1999, a group of experts came together to find a solution to this problem. They determined that the “war on drugs” was a “war on people.” With the goal of establishing a legal framework for harm reduction, in 2000 they made their law decriminalizing the consumption of all drugs.

Like in the USA, 1% of Portugal’s population (100,000 out of 10 million) were using hard drugs. The Portuguese consider a drug addict not a criminal, but a sick person.

With their ten-year review studying drug consumption trends from 2001 to 2009, they found the following: “And nothing bad happened.” The big negatives some predicted did not materialize. They experienced none of the expected “drug tourism” (young backpackers didn’t converge on Portugal as the new drug mecca).

Statistically the number of people who’ve tried various drugs increased a little (possibly because it is more comfortable to admit it after the change in laws). There was no change in use rates from when drugs were illegal.  Over the decade, there was a reduction in use by young people (age 15-24). Among that age group, recreational use went up in 2003 (immediately after the new law went into force) and then dropped back down in 2005. Portugal now has fewer people with HIV and more people in treatment. The police like it as they can now focus on violent crime. The burden on Portugal’s prisons and criminal system is less. And the relationship between the Portuguese government and its drug-using population went from enemy to advocate. The slight increase of consumption in Portugal after this law was similar to increases in Italy and Spain during the same period; therefore, it was likely a regional trend not related to their law change.

Netherlands
Changes recently introduced in the Netherlands seem designed to add restrictions to coffeeshops: They must now be 350 meters from schools rather than 250 meters. The THC must be limited to 15%. This distinction means that, legally, there are two kinds of pot — one harder and one softer.

The Dutch make a firm distinction between hard and soft drugs. With their model, Dutch use of heroin is very low. The problem with the coffeeshop model of retailing marijuana is “the grey area” (the back side, wholesaling, which has never really been addressed and is just kind of ignored by the Dutch system). The Dutch cannot deal with the reality of wholesaling because that would break international trade agreements (put on all countries via the UN by the USA), and that would be very expensive.

With pressure from outside (so foreigners don’t come in and smoke), some in the Dutch government are trying to make coffeeshops become clubs only for locals rather than commercial sales points. Only locals with membership cards could enter. This is unpopular in the Netherlands because officials fear crime will go up, and cities like the status quo. On this issue, it’s more progressive urban areas against the conservative rural votes in their parliament.

Marijuana Law Elsewhere in Europe Varies
In Switzerland, it’s a civil offense with a fine but no crime.

The Czechs are free to grow their own.

The Belgians can grow one plant per person on their own or, more efficiently, by joining cannabis clubs.

Spaniards can retail seeds and gear but not actual marijuana. They can grow it in conjunction with marijuana clubs.

Greece’s prisons are full, and 40% of its prison population is there on drug charges. As they have no money, in the future treatment will increase, and incarceration will decrease. While you can get a fine now for smoking marijuana, trends in Greece are towards allowing home growing and personal use.

For the Swedes, not taking drugs is a matter of willpower: “If you are weak and partake, your biology changes and you then get addicted.” Therefore, Swedish drug policy is regressive v.v. other European nations.

Most of Europe has the option to not enforce existing laws: “opportunistic” or “expediency” principle. In the USA, if the law exists, it must be enforced. (It’s the same in Germany, so heroin was made legally a medicine in order to allow “café fix” maintenance centers.) Europe wants science over ideology.

USA: The impact on European media of California’s recent Prop 19 debate was much greater than Portugal’s Law 30. Europeans understand that the problem (the war on marijuana) emanates from the USA. The success of I-502 in Washington State would be huge in Europe. In Seattle, I-75 is de facto decriminalization. These are the kinds of actions that are viable within today’s parameters. If I-502 passes, this very well may be the start of a big change in international laws.

Time for a New Approach to Marijuana

As a traveler, I’ve been able to see how different societies creatively grapple with all kinds of issues — including marijuana use and abuse. This is an area where I think we can learn from Europeans, who have been coming at this from a “harm reduction” perspective rather than just “crime and punishment.”

Based on the drug policy successes I’ve seen overseas, I am proud to be a co-sponsor of New Approach Washington — an initiative to pragmatically legalize, tax, and regulate marijuana. This initiative is also sponsored by former US District Attorney John McKay, Seattle City Attorney Peter Holmes, and other respected legislators, professors, and civic leaders.

Nobody is advocating marijuana use in this discussion. Caring people are realizing that it simply makes more sense to regulate and tax marijuana rather than criminalize it. Care is being given to address the understandable and important concerns about pot getting into young people’s hands and anyone driving while intoxicated by anything. I firmly believe (and statistics from other countries ahead of us on this matter affirm the belief) that drug use will not go up substantially, and a big bite will be taken out of organized crime while freeing law enforcement’s time to focus on more dangerous criminals.

The initiative we are promoting is detailed and pragmatic, designed to win the approval of thoughtful people across the political spectrum. To learn more, visit the New Approach Washington website. If you have friends who are Washington State voters…pass the word along. We can use your help — you can even become a volunteer signature-gatherer

Goodbuy Mr. Steves

I just received an email I thought you might enjoy:

Dear Mr. Steves, I have spent thousands of dollars on Rick Steves tours through the years and was planning a major Eastern European tour with my entire family for our 50th anniversary in 2010…until I read the Boston Globe article about how Mr Steves is a pothead and a proponent of drug use. I will never use your company again and will do everything in my power to discourage anyone from using your tours. I have already told at least five people and will continue to do so. With the drug problem in this country Mr. Steves should be ashamed of himsel…if he want to be a drug addict that’s his business but he doesn’t have to promote the use of drugs. Enogh said…goodbuy Mr. Steves!!!!

Ouch! There goes a lot of business. We’ll have to find a way to enjoy Europe without that man from Boston.

There’s a lot of movement in the decriminalize-marijuana movement these days. I get a lot of emails like this, and they cause me to think of the people who led the movement to decriminalize alcohol back in the 1930s. When our society finally decided to end the Prohibition on alcohol, I wonder if people who advocated regulating and taxing alcohol, taking the crime out of the equation, and treating its abuse as a health problem got similar feedback.