Congratulations, Europe, on Winning the Nobel Peace Price

To all my European friends–from Portugal to Germany to Finland, and from Bulgaria to Slovenia to Ireland–I’d just like to say: Nice job!

Today the Nobel Committee awarded its prestigious top prize to 500 million people who have, for the last 65 years, made a conscious decision to live together in peace and harmony: the European Union (EU). In the words of Nobel Committee Chairman Thorbjoern Jagland, “The Norwegian Nobel Committee wishes to focus on what it sees as the EU’s most important result, the successful struggle for peace and reconciliation and for democracy and human rights. The stabilizing part played by the EU has helped to transform most of Europe from a continent of war to a continent of peace.”

Who could possibly be more deserving of a peace prize? When your grandparents were kids, Europe had been wracked by 500 years of virtually uninterrupted warfare. Today Europeans are mocked for their pacifistic ways. Wow. What a transformation.

In my 2009 book Travel as a Political Act, I wrote:

For the EU’s founders, money took a backseat to their primary motivation: peace. Even the biggest Euroskeptic recognizes that, in weaving together the economies of former enemies like France and Germany, everyone has become so interconnected that Europe will never again suffer devastation from a major war as they did twice in the last century. The French and the Germans still don’t agree on most things. But now they’ve become too financially interdependent to take up arms over their differences. Minimizing the possibility of an intra-European war is the triumph of the EU.

When boots do hit the ground in a war, Europeans believe it’s because they have failed to prevent it. They prefer endless diplomacy to once-in-a-while war. Europe’s reluctance to go to war frustrates some Americans. I believe their relative pacifism is because Europeans know the reality of war, while most Americans do not. Of course, if you have a loved one who has fought or died in Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam, you know what a war is. But as a society, the US can’t remember actually hosting a war. Europeans have told me that they believe Americans were more willing to use cluster bombs and napalm to pacify Fallujah because in the age of modern warfare, no American city has ever been wiped from existence like Coventry, Dresden, Rotterdam, or Warsaw. It’s easier to feel detached when a war is something you watch on the nightly news, rather than something that killed your grandfather or destroyed your hometown.

Europe knows what a war is. It ripped itself to shreds twice within my grandparents’ lifetime. Consider France in World War I. France (with one-quarter as many people as we have) lost as many people as we’ve lost in the entire Iraq War—over 4,000 people—in one day…many times. They lost as many people as we lost in Vietnam (60,000) in one month. And then it happened again and again until, by the end of World War I, an estimated half of all the men in France between the ages of 15 and 30 were casualties. When some Americans, frustrated at France’s reluctance to follow us into a war, call the French “surrender monkeys,” I believe it shows their ignorance of history. …

In 1947, in the rubble of a bombed-out Europe, Euro-visionaries assembled and agreed that they needed to overcome the hell that they were bringing upon themselves every couple of generations with these wars. Their solution was to unite. Of course, a union is nothing without people giving up some measure of real sovereignty. Since 1947, proponents of a European Union have been convincing the people of proud and independent nations to trade away bits and pieces of their independence. It’s a tough sell. But in a fitful evolution—two steps forward and one step back—over the last sixty or so years, they have created a European union.

Yes, Europe has had its economic woes the last few years. (Who hasn’t?) But a bold and ambitious experiment like the European Union is bound to have some growing pains, as member states with starkly different lifestyles, priorities, and fiscal philosophies are now sharing one big pot. Spain and Greece get all the press for their 25 percent unemployment and isolated riots, but more than half of the 27 EU members are currently not in recession–and several (Poland, the Baltic States) are enjoying impressive growth. Remember: Europe still has the biggest economy on earth (2011 GDP: $17.33 trillion in the EU vs. $15.09 trillion in the US), and as any traveler who has recently experienced sticker shock abroad can tell you, the euro currency is still mighty healthy. Europe’s vast investment in infrastructure has laced together a remarkable free-trade zone of superhighways and bullet trains that make it easier than ever to get around. The fact is, while some of its members are struggling, most EU citizens are much better off today than they were five, ten, twenty, or fifty years ago.

Naysayers continue to predict the imminent collapse of Europe. But what these people don’t understand is that European unity is not just a convenient political talking point that’s easily abandoned in tough times. It’s a way of life that most Europeans deeply believe in. While “Euroskeptics” complain loud and hard about the many failings of the EU–just as American politicians wrangle over differing viewpoints–ultimately Europeans believe as fiercely in unity, cooperation, and celebrating diversity as Americans believe in life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

I’m sure many stateside critics will scoff at this prize. They’ll say that the Europeans are rewarding themselves for their “failing” system. (This misses the fact that the Norwegians who awarded the prize are not, themselves, EU citizens.) These critics, blinded by their own agenda, are missing the historical long view, which tell an astonishing success story. Sixty-seven years ago, Europe was rubble and millions were dead. With the generous kick-start of the Marshall Plan and visionary leaders pushing a pacifistic, economy-growing agenda, Europeans transformed their continent. Today there are few more prosperous and more peaceful places on earth. War between its members is unimaginable. Even the most hardened cynic can’t deny…Europe is doing something right.

I’ll end with more words from Thorbjoern Jagland and the Nobel Committee:

The union and its forerunners have for over six decades contributed to the advancement of peace and reconciliation, democracy and human rights in Europe. … Since 1945, that reconciliation has become a reality. The dreadful suffering in World War II demonstrated the need for a new Europe. Over a seventy-year period, Germany and France had fought three wars. Today war between Germany and France is unthinkable. This shows how, through well-aimed efforts and by building up mutual confidence, historical enemies can become close partners.

Again, Europe–nice job! You deserve it.


Not long ago, Europe was bombed flat, but–like Dresden’s iconic Frauenkirche–it has been rebuilt and is determined to have peace.

Comments

13 Replies to “Congratulations, Europe, on Winning the Nobel Peace Price”

  1. The one conclusion that I have about the naysayers is that they never have a solution only a complaint. Europe has been through so many hard times and still stick together and try and find a solution. We often call them slackers, but I look at how stressed out and over commited Americans are and I am sure that has a lot to do with physical and mental health.

  2. I was born in 1947 in England. I remember the bomb sites. I remember rationing. I can only say that I hope the peace lasts.

  3. I was born in 1938 in Germany (living in US for 50 years, but visiting Europe almost every year) and will never forget the sound of sirens. I truly believe the desire for unity is stronger in Europe than the complications stemming from the economic downturn in some areas.

  4. Well put, Rick. Clear and informed. Based upon direct experience, not hearsay. Too much xenophobia in America. Ignorance and fear dominate what little useful dialogue there is. Self-serving politicians and religious zealots exploit this. The results speak for themselves.

  5. One other very important thing I forgot to mention is that there are 2 countries in Europe that avoided the economic crisis, whose GDP has grown, and whose unemployment rate is low and not coincidentally those 2 countries did NOT adopt the Euro. They are Switzerland and Sweden and before the heavy-government enthusiasts cheer, it should be noted that Sweden over the last 10 years adopted free market reforms, privatized some government owned businesses and in general has acknowledged that heavily socialized governments do not work as well. Switzerland’s success as well is a result of its unique government structure wherein there is a weak centralized government and strong canton or state independence to make decisions. While peace anywhere is a goal worthy to attain, I think the mistake with the strong centralized EU is that people’s independence is stifled and it’s worth remembering that a free people living in a free market economy is the surest path to a peaceful society without war. Isn’t that a lesson to re-learn?

  6. Jan, check your facts. First, Switzerland is NOT in the EU. Second, Poland is the only EU country that never entered recession, through this whole crisis–its economy has just stubbornly kept growing. Poland, like Slovakia and the Baltic States, are perfect examples of what could have been struggling post-communist nations, but instead have been buoyed by EU integration, support, and investment. And, oh yeah, Estonia (one of those Baltic success stories) and Slovakia both use the euro. Poles and Slovaks (like most Europeans) love to complain about the EU, but it’s impossible to deny they’re far better off than they were before they joined.

  7. Thanks for this very well stated view. I am continually amazed by the second guessers who continually resort to “let’s bomb the hell out of them right now” solutions. Peace and diplomacy are hard and take a long time But their benefits are far better than the alternatives.

  8. Nice entry Rick. – A more fulsome explanation than what is normally offered on this side of the pond. For all its shortcomings, the peaceful arrangement that the people of Europe have put forward has already yielded better results than most.

  9. Frank, re-read what I said. I never said Switzerland WAS in the EU. I said they, like Sweden, never adopted the Euro and that is part of the reason why they are doing better economically then the rest of Europe. Many wars in Europe were started because of bad economic conditions. Many historians cite the harsh economic climate in Germany after WW1 as a reason for the rise of Adolph Hitler. EU bureaucracy is NOT the reason there is peace in Europe. Access to free markets and the security provided by NATO is the reason peace has been attained in Europe. How can the EU be credited for 60 plus years of peace when it was only created in 1993? Peace in Europe was a function of the Cold War and the security umbrella provided by the United States and nuclear weapons. For all the integration that Europe has seen, it still has no true common foreign and security policy and it is unlikely to develop one because states will simply not surrender their sovereignty on the issue that is most sacred to them: their security. While the EU may have some merits in binding countries together on some cooperative levels, I think a heavy-handed Brussels will stifle the very diversity that RS says he champions.

  10. The Nobel Prize is increasingly politicized. Why doesn’t Norway join the European Union if it is so wonderful?

    One institution is much more responsible for European peace and democracy. It led the effort to drive out the Nazis. In the Cold War, it kept the communists at bay. It ended ethnic cleansing in the Balkans. Norway was happy to live under its nuclear umbrella. The institution is the American military. Despite its accomplishments, it will continue to suffer ankle biting from Norway and the rest of Europe. The average member of the Nobel committee would rather cut off his arm than give credit where it is due.

  11. If I lived in the European Union, its Nobel Peace Prize would make me uncomfortable. Consider the following:

    The U.N. Peacekeeping Forces won the award. A few years later, they were widely involved in rapes, child abuse, and sex for food scandals. They watched while genocide occurred in Rwanda and the Balkans.

    Gorbachev was awarded for his attempt to save the Soviet Union. His empire collapsed.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency won for its attempts to help Iran. It now turns out that Iran really is trying to make a nuclear bomb.

    Al Gore and the International Panel on Climate Change won. It turns out that according to the Daily Telegraph, global warming ended 16 years ago. This is good new for non-warm-mongers. (http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/154001/)

    Yassir Arafat shared the award with some Israeli leaders. He then resumed terrorist attacks in his attempts to destroy Israel.

    President Obama received a nomination after a few weeks in office, and then won. In an act of war, our diplomats were murdered in Libya.

    The good news is that the EU could use the prize money. I think the German taxpayers should get it, since they’re paying for the prize.

Comments are closed.